The two pie charts below show changes in world population by region between 1910 and 2010.
Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features, and make any relevant comparisons.
The pie charts compare the percentage of world population contributed by each continent in the years 1910 and 2010.
Overall, the world population increased about 4 times over the 100-year period, with the proportion of world population from Asia and Europe falling, while that from Africa and Latin America rising.
In 1910, 60% of the population of the world was from Asia, while the populace in Europe(Including Russia) accounted for 25% of the world. By 2010, the number of Asian had fallen by 6%, and European’s percentage in the world had also declined by 11%. By contrast, population in North America remained stable at 5% of the total world population throughout the period in the same way as other territories ( 3% in both years).
On the other hand, both Africa and Latin America saw an increase in their population, from 4% and 3% in 1910 to 10% and 8% in 2000 respectively. Moreover, Middle East and North Africa, a new category appeared in 2010, took up a full 6% of the total number of people on the planet.
- The two pie charts below show changes in world population by region between 1910 and 2010 Summarise the information by choosing and reporting the key features and make any relevant comparisons 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 400, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iod in the same way as other territories 3% in both years. On the other hand, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, while, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78651685393 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7281398659 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1714865256 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174415101426 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904632990001 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650439308321 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124552691149 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717704466725 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.