The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
The diagram details the process by which rainwater is gathered for Australian town use.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily clear that this man-made process comprises various steps, commencing with rainwater falling into drain pipes and ending with using clean water in households.
At the first stage of the process, rainwater run from the roof into the drains, which are installed underground and run along the house to accommodate rainwater, after passing through this machine, rainwater is sent to a water filter to remove impurities before being pushed into big storage.
The process continues with treating water, where water is filtered so that it will be treated by chemicals to create the cleanest water possible. Eventually, providing clean water follows the water pipes back to homes, which Australian domestics utilize. At this time, water has to meet the standard about the level of cleanliness to certain people's health.
- The chart shows the hours per week spent watching TV by gender and by age group in 2011 in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparation where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 42
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 67
- The graph below shows the usage of oil in four different countries between 1966 and 2006 as a percentage of total energy use within each nation 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41333333333 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59311909998 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2218803411 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257154360139 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141609648474 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110842984805 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180167290137 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118591047712 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41333333333 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59311909998 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2218803411 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257154360139 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141609648474 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110842984805 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180167290137 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118591047712 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.