Professors on Television
The passage suggests three reasons for the professor to appear on T.V. programs; to gain reputation for the professor, publicity for the University and benefits for the viewers of the television program. However, the lecture disagrees with these points presented in the passage.
Firstly, the author of the passage says that by being on television the professor can increase his/her reputation. The lecturer attacks this claim by stating that usually a professor who appears on T.V. is not considered a serious researcher by his/her peers and so might not be invited to state of the art conferences. Thus, by being on T.V negatively impacts the reputation of a professor.
Secondly, the passage states that if professor appears on T.V it can help University as more people will become aware of the University and in turn more applications will be send to the University. The lecturer refutes this claim by mentioning that the time a professor spends on a TV station might be better spend educating students of the University.
Furthermore, the passage suggests being on TV might help educate more people regarding cutting edge research. This claim of the author is also belied by the lecturer stating that usually professors don't go in depth of the topics and their television programs are limited to crux of the topic. Additionally, it is also mentioned the information provided by the professor on television programs can easily be conveyed by an informed reporter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | himal | view | |
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
- The Sydney Opera House 73
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 66
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 78
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals Altruism is the opposite of selfishness individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves Examples of altruism ab 3
- Two years ago radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call in advice programs that it broadcast since that time its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly Given WCQP s recent succe 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...er peers and so might not be invited to state of the art conferences. Thus, by being on T.V nega...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...he art conferences. Thus, by being on T.V negatively impacts the reputation of a ...
^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: V
...e states that if professor appears on T.V it can help University as more people w...
^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ecturer stating that usually professors dont go in depth of the topics and their tel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 240.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17083333333 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88703699992 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508333333333 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7591017144 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.1 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342763499405 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148526395007 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105434472895 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224275138203 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634948184544 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.