Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a
hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually
be diminished.
Reputation is earned by the good works done by people. It depends on the extent and positive impact that work has on the welfare of human beings. However, knowing personally is also important for people to consider any reputed people as their role models. The prompt claims that the reputation of any famous person will be diminished because of the interference of the media and social media as well and for that reason, people can't consider any living human being as their role model. In my opinion, I mostly agree with the reason of the claim because of the following two reasons.
Firstly, the availability of social media has now become more frequent. Anyone is using social media and through social media, people are getting more private information about other people. It is just a matter of time before a good person can be considered a bad person when anything bad is published about them without getting checked the authenticity. For example, a few days ago in an award-giving ceremony, a famous actor slapped another actor for being jocular to his wife. And after
that, the reputation of that famous actor is ruined. He was abandoned by his followers and many media persons were saying bad about his bold step. Suddenly, he became a monster to the people who used to deify him. This news may be presented in a different manner, which can be less aggressive, and then his reputation would not down so drastically. People nowadays are not getting the opportunity to justify the reason behind any actions because social media is grabbing their brains. People are believing the thing they are watching. So, the involvement of the media in the reputation of any famous person may hamper his/her position.
Secondly, because of the ruined reputation living person can not be considered a role model. Doing heroic work doesn't make a person a hero, it includes the philosophy that the person follows as well. For instance, people follow some actors as their role models and follow them. However, this perspective can change when this person's personal life is revealed to the general people. When that successful actor is not good as a husband and beat up his wife, this news is reached his followers through social media. This will ruin the position that they achieved in the heart of their followers.
Some may argue that it may increase the reputation and sometimes help to increase the impact of good work. But if anything bad is revealed about that person will destroy them. And it is because of the wrong behavior of social media.
- Throughout the world s oceans hard structures such as natural reefs provide ideal marine habitats Reefs provide hard surfaces to which plants coral and sponges can attach and thereby provide food and shelter for many types of fish Recently workers in the 75
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing During the past year Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than our 50
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 429, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...dia as well and for that reason, people cant consider any living human being as thei...
^^^^
Line 2, column 411, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ew days ago in an award-giving ceremony, a famous actor slapped another actor for...
^^
Line 2, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for being jocular to his wife. And after that, the reputation of that famous acto...
^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different manner" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...o deify him. This news may be presented in a different manner, which can be less aggressive, and then...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 493, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... media is grabbing their brains. People are believing the thing they are watching. So, the in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sidered a role model. Doing heroic work doesnt make a person a hero, it includes the p...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...wever, this perspective can change when this persons personal life is revealed to th...
^^^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...e heart of their followers. Some may argue that it may increase the reputation and...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2110.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85057471264 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47937189187 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475862068966 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5560578898 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196273157938 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0578537319884 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609891195512 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120122115761 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065084227016 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.