Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home, while others believe children should learn this at school. Discuss both views and give your own opinion ?
Whether students should learn how to recycle and limit waste at their places of residence or at schools has been a contriversial issue. The merits of both will be elaborated below.
On the one hand, there are two advantages for chidren when they receive education of using watse for othe purposes or limiting amount of trash. First, by observing their parents recycle and reuse their used things, children can copy the patterns of good behaviors from their mom and dad. As children spend the majority of their time at home, learning from parental models could undertake naturally and the normal constraints from supervision of teachers are relieved. Likewise, it is obvious that in educational organisations, young students may not have oppoturnities to take part in practically categorizing garbage or recycling thrown-away objects. By contrast, children can join in the actual activities with their father and mother while they are at their safe heaven. Therefore, it would be comfortable for students that they can learn to protect their living habitat from pollution at their place of living.
On the other hand, children can learn methods from their teachers and friends. The first benefit when children follow guides of padagogical expert is that approach to these issue could be easy for them understand and remember. This is because school teachers are trained to provide knowledge in the most scientifically and effectively way. In this sense, these people are more capable to educate students than students' father and mother. Additionally, given the impact of peer pressure, which is tendency to imitate the behaviors of kids' schoolmates, young students thereby standing a higher chance to establish habit of recycling and restricting waste. Finally, with adequate facilities available at education system, the process of learning would become more convenient for students. For instance, by showing images and videos about the damage caused by reckless acts of humans upon the evironment, the effect will be more trivial, thereby making children impressed and remembering longer their lessons. Thus, children may find it is more thorough and detailed when absorbing knowledge of recycling and dodging waste at schools.
In sum, by watching parents as well as learning from teachers and classmates how to alliviate their affects on the environment, the learning process of children is simplier and less stressed. I believe that the combination of effort from family and school would encourage the rightful views and actions of children towards the nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-14 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-14 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-01 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What is the cause of this What can be done to solve this problem 84
- Some people think that staying in hotels is not a good option to know about a country or its people To what extent do you agree or disagree with this argument 89
- Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems To what extend do you agree 78
- Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work rather than on university education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many different countries have most shops and products that are the same Some people consider this to be a positive development while others think it is a negative development Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... On the other hand, children can learn methods from their teachers and friends....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, likewise, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35643564356 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75342333554 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5674941121 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.222222222 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262091518913 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840922853112 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557310113031 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176927713286 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473313050349 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.