The chart below shows the number of travelers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the number of travelers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.

The provided bar chart gives information about the figure for visitors who used three different airports over a period of six years in New York City.

Overall, there was a fluctuant trend in the number of passengers who travelled through John F Kennedy airport, meanwhile two other airports saw an upward trend. LaGuardia airport reached a highest point at the end of the year.

Looking at the detail, the number of travellers at LaGuardia airport was the highest position in 1995, by 35m while John F. Kennedy airport and Newark airport took around 26m and 16m in the figure for airport visitors respectively in the same year.

The number of tourists at John F. Kennedy airport increased remarkably from 26m to 47m during three years period. LaGuardia airport went up slightly in the number of people who travelled, at 44m in the same period but tourist used Newark airport took the lowest point before grew up dramatically at 42m in the figure for travellers. At the last two years, the number of tourists rose sharply at John F Kennedy and LaGuardia airports meanwhile only Newark airport remained almost unchanged in the number of passengers

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-01-26 hoang tuan minh 67 view
2022-10-17 Dieu linh03 61 view
2022-10-07 tieuquynh 84 view
2022-09-19 Hanabi view
2021-10-21 Khanhu010101 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 188, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...upward trend. LaGuardia airport reached a highest point at the end of the year. ...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96391752577 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54721072852 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515463917526 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7673739744 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228258858043 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10906130345 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431443595231 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160391583995 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303709781923 0.0819641961636 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.