The line graph gives information about how many single-family houses were built in different areas of the United States which are Northeast, Midwest, South, and West between 2006 and 2012. There was a similar downward trend from 2006 to 2010 in each region.
In general, there were big differences in the number of houses built in the various regions of the country, but most of the regions seem to follow the same rising and falling trends.
To begin with, although each region had a different number of houses initially, all areas’ tendencies to collapse were matching in the first four years of the given time period. While constructions in the Midwest and the Northeast had a marginal fall, there were significant and moderate changes in the South and the West, respectively.
When it comes to the last period, trends were beginning to change. As in 2006, houses in the South were at the highest level, it rose to just under 400000. While variety in the West has grown, the Midwest remained stable. In addition, the only one that was continuing to decrease was the Northeast, in comparison to the beginning, it almost quartered at the end.
- The chart below shows information about different species of birds observed in Woodchuck county at different times of the year 61
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 will projection till 2050 73
- The charts below show the number of working hours per week in industrial sector in four European countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons with relevant 84
- The chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meatin a European country between 1979 and 2004
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, in addition, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89285714286 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57880279685 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7039336629 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136314957471 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503557121773 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494288914808 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856641022152 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448021710348 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.