The provided chart illustrates the proportion of people living in an average household in America from 1981 to 2001.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the percentage of UK residents residing in small units of families from 1 to 2 people in contrast to a decline in the remaining categories. Additionally, the figure for households with two members ranked first over the given years.
Turning to the detail, in 1981, the proportion of individuals living in families with two people stood at 31% of the whole population, then, the figure for this family genre went up slightly to 34% at the end of the period. In addition, the number of Americans who chose to live alone grew considerably from 17% in 1981 to 26% in 2001.
Regarding the remaining family types, the proportion of people living in extended families ( 6 people) decreased significantly from 6% to 2% while the figure for households with 5 members went down gradually from 8% to 6% over the examined period. Meanwhile, the figures for households with 3-4 people experienced a minimal decline from approximately 19% ( in 1981) to 16%( in 2001).
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian towns 84
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games why do they do this Is this positive or negative development 73
- The table below shows show the number of cars made in Argentina Australia and Thailand from 2003 to 2009
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ably from 17% in 1981 to 26% in 2001. Regarding the remaining family types, th...
^^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of people living in extended families 6 people decreased significantly from 6%...
^^
Line 7, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a minimal decline from approximately 19% in 1981 to 16% in 2001.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, then, while, in addition, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92021276596 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86999017322 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1950160424 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8571428571 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263036905349 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136047345487 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076882769171 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178355279684 0.15604864568 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629672865803 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.