The chart compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001.
The given chart compares the number of people per household computed in percentage in the UK over a period of two decades from 1981 to 2001.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the trend of small families has increased significantly by the end of the period. However, a family of two remained the common highest trend over 20 years period.
According to the given illustration, families with two people led the chart over the given time length. The year 1981 marked a maximum of 31% of families with 2 people, which rose by 3% in 2001. Followed next by the family of 1 person, which also witnessed an increase of 3%, jumped to 23% after 2 decades. Although only 12% of families had 4 people in the former year, they observed an upward trend of 3% in 2001.
However, a contrasting trend can be seen in the remaining three scenarios. A decline of 3% was observed in houses with 3 people (20% down to 17%). Nearly 2% of dropdown was observed in houses with 5 persons (8% down to 6%). The scenario of big families with 6 or more people plummeted over time and fell down to just 2%, a decline of 4% from the earlier year.
- A chart on the average annual expenditures on a cell phone and residential phone services 2001 2010 73
- The graph shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 78
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 71
- The Chart below show the distribution of families with children by employment status 87
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which also witnessed an increase of 3%, jumped to 23% after 2 decades. Although ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50236966825 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52283210609 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559241706161 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9032548954 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3636363636 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235280981463 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941820561178 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179706948137 0.0843802449381 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203959452695 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.260279177376 0.0819641961636 318% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.