The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart compares four causes of farmland becoming degraded in the world today, while the table illustrates how these four causes affected differently in three regions in the 1990s.
Overall, it is clear that animal grazing and tree clearance were two dominant causes of land degradation. It is worth noting that Europe suffered the most severely from farmland degradation.
Globally, 65% of degradation is caused by too much animal grazing and deforestation, constituting 35% and 30% respectively. A further 28% of global degradation is caused by the over-cultivation of crops, while other causes accounted for only 7%.
Regarding regions affected. Europe, with the highest land degradation (23%), had nearly 10% of degradation due to deforestation. At the same time, the impact of this cause on Oceania and North America was minimal, recording only 1.7% and 0.2% of land degraded, respectively. Europe also suffered from over-cultivation (7.7%) and too much grazing (5.5%). In contrast, Oceania had 13% of degraded farmland mainly due to over-grazing (11.3%). Furthermore, North America had the lowest proportion of degradation (5%), and the most prominent causes were over-cultivation (3.3%) and, to a lesser extent (1.5%).
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 73
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is important for people to take risks in both their professional lives and personal lives Do the advantages of taking these risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4708994709 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20076521463 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.942305907 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 1.13902439024 966% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150126565765 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558648787455 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759666436608 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109134685343 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103707227431 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4708994709 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20076521463 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.942305907 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1818181818 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 1.13902439024 966% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150126565765 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558648787455 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759666436608 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109134685343 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103707227431 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.