The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995- 2002.
The provided chart demonstrates the total number of minutes spent on telephone calls in the United Kingdom, separated into three different categories during the period of 7 years starting from 1995.
Looking at the bar chart, it is clearly seen that the amount of time spent on national and international-fixed line and mobiles (all calls) increased significantly. In addition, the figure for the local-fixed line fluctuated. Furthermore, the number of minutes spent on local-fixed lines by British people was the most popular, and the lowest figure on the chart was for mobiles(all calls).
The amount of time spent on local-fixed line ranked for the first position with over 70 billion minutes, which was 12 times as high as the figure for mobiles in 1995. Besides, people in Britain spent on national and international fixed line nearly 40 billion at the same time. Moreover, upward trends were seen in the given telephone calls during the course of the period. In 1998, the number of minutes spent on national and international -fixed line, and mobiles reached 50, and 12 respectively. Furthermore, the figure for local-fixed line hit a peak at 90 billion.
From 1999 to 2002, there were increases in the number of minutes spent on national and international fixed line and mobiles. By contrast, the opposite trend was true for the figure for local fixed-line. The number of minutes spent on local fixed line fell slightly to over 70 billion, but remaining the first position in 2002. Additionally, the figure for national and international reached a peak at 60 billion, the lowest figure on the chart was for mobiles at approximately 38.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 67
- Do you agree with the idea that technology help you a lot why 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- Task 1 The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 THI 30 4 2020 QU TR NH H C TH C H NH L M THI TH T FULL 2020 2021 C C N M THI L P L I FORM NH NHAU H C TO N DI N 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocal-fixed line fluctuated. Furthermore, the number of minutes spent on local-fix...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
... were seen in the given telephone calls during the course of the period. In 1998, the number of minu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06642066421 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91682420708 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453874538745 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4996895306 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.615384615 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194286818066 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090657584987 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100541272842 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178684542569 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130594912449 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocal-fixed line fluctuated. Furthermore, the number of minutes spent on local-fix...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
... were seen in the given telephone calls during the course of the period. In 1998, the number of minu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 271.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06642066421 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91682420708 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453874538745 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4996895306 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.615384615 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61538461538 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194286818066 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090657584987 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100541272842 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178684542569 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130594912449 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.