The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government,
industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling
reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It is the resposibility of a society to take great care to prepare its youth for the challenges of the future, since they will be the ones forging the path ahead. This includes preparing young people for future leadership roles in government, industry and other fields. Many believe that the key to this is instilling a sense of cooperation rather than competition in them. I agree with this belief system and will be providing two reasons to support my opinion. However, I do believe that cooperation is not the only quality required to build future leaders and will be addressing that as well.
Firstly, it is widely known that cooperation is the most important quality a leader can have. A leader who can work with his people and maintain harmony is considered highly successful and only someone who understands the value of cooperation can achieve this. The Great Manager Institute recently released a study in which they revealed the qualities that the 1 million+ participants had considered as most important while ranking their leaders over the past 10 years. Cooperation and team work was the consistent winner by a large margin. Thus, the value of cooperation was reinforced with the support of data, at least in the industry.
Further, the world has seen both governments who have prized cooperation in their leaders and governments who believe in their competitive spirit instead. The Japanese are a great example to bring in here, as they have seen governments of both kinds in recent history. During World War 2, a competitive Japanese government decided to bomb Pearl Harbour in the USA and that decision eventually brought the horrors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on them. Learning from their mistakes, the people have chosen to elect governments that highly prized cooperation instead, and taught the same to their children as well. This has made Japan world leaders and a utopian society where people help each other, crime rates are extremely low and quality of life is very high.
However, some might counter that leaders need more qualities that just cooperation to be considered great. It is true that cooperation is not the only quality required to build good future leaders. Leaders need to be excellent communicators, approachable, empathetic, forward-thinking and humble along with cooperative. Society needs to inculcate all these qualities to bring forth the finest quality of leaders for all domains. Only by this well rounded personality development can help set the children on the right path for their and the society's future.
To conclude, the belief that the best way for a society to prepare it's youth for future leadership roles in government, industry etc is to instill a sense of cooperation instead of competition in them is a complex matter. In my opinion, this is the right approach as it the single most important quality in a leader and there is historic proof that a sense of cooperation leads to a better future than a sense of competition. I do however concede that cooperation is not the only quality required to build good leaders and that society must focus on well-rounded overall development of its youth to achieve this goal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | Muggle1313 | 50 | view |
- Claim The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint Reason Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea Write a respo 66
- Collectors prize the ancient life size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human head 59
- Argument Topic The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies 68
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 68
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 69
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, at least, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2679.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03571428571 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81543747863 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456766917293 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4237484352 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.47826087 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1304347826 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08695652174 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229457767377 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708764759664 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786142132655 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137920007766 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074118267403 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, still, thus, well, while, at least, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2679.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 532.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03571428571 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80261649409 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81543747863 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456766917293 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4237484352 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.47826087 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1304347826 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08695652174 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229457767377 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708764759664 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786142132655 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137920007766 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074118267403 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.