The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart depicts how much travellers who came from Australia, USA, UK, Japan and China spent when they visited New Zealandevery year from 1996 to 2016. In general, all subjects' expenditure increased, except Japan.
In 1996, Australia visitors spent more than 1000 new zealand dollars on visiting this nation. Moreover, it was on the first place among 5 countries. In the next ten years, the amount of money was twofold compared to that in 1996 before declining slightly to more than 2000 in 2014. China was the country that used the least money in New zealand. Chinese voyagers spent approximately 0 dollar. Then, it had a noticable upward tendency to 500 dollars in the following eight years before going down and climbing up again in a decade later.
USA took the second place in top nations which had the greastest expenditure. At the begining point of the survey, American used nearly 800 dollars and rose dramatically, reaching its peak in 2010 with more than 1500 dollars. Four years later, the figure decreased to about 1000. UK and japan had the similar starting points. Both of these countries' travellers spent about 500 dollars in 1996. After fluctuating for a long period of time, while UK had a significant increase, Japan remained unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-13 | phuongphuongt1234 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | phuongphuongt1234 | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Renel Mosqueda Bacalso | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | mayankdhami | 80 | view |
| 2018-12-06 | Nimasha | 80 | view |
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the year 1993 to 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Online shopping is increasing dramatically How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
The line chart depicts how much travellers who came from Australia, USA...
^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
... Chinese voyagers spent approximately 0 dollar. Then, it had a noticable upward tenden...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s in 1996. After fluctuating for a long period of time, while UK had a significant increase, J...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1055.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97641509434 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55893074496 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674528301887 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1762761406 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.3571428571 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106150678803 0.215688989381 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336863859871 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039685096923 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689920783358 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213108012133 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.01 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.