The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site

This report derives from two pictorial illustrating the current layout of a commercial site on the east of the town Norbiton as well as the planned renovation blueprint of the sector.

Broadly speaking, the whole manufacturing area is aimed to convert into a residential neighborhood with the installment various supporting facilities and residences in the predicted diagram.

A glance at the redevelopment diagram reveals that, all the industries will be removed. Shops will set up around the rotary and a hospital will be built at the southeast side of it. The eastern road from the roundabout will have housing and playground scattered around it. Eventually, it will lead to a school that is to be constructed at the far east section of the map. In the south, at the junction of the two highways a small roundabout will be established.

By contrast, two more openings will be added to the traffic circle. One will go towards northwest where homes will be constructed at the end and north side of it. Other will pass through the river as a new bridge is to be established to connect it with homes and roads at the far northern side. As a result, the current country side will be shrinked and shifted at the east side of the map.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, broadly speaking, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1025.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76744186047 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8449227972 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548837209302 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4926739837 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1818181818 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0684229290501 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293970143394 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443957250481 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583990502069 0.15604864568 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562836555093 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.