Various unexpected circumstances might happen during a speech and saying something incorrect and misleading could be one of them. In my perspective, if the speaker suddenly uses incorrect information in his speech, it's better to wait until the session is over and then remind him of the mistakes. I have two reasons to support my notion which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, everyone can make mistakes, especially during a presentation or speech in which the lecturer is under a lot of pressure. These flaws can be rooted in anxiety, lack of concentration, or information and it truly contradicts humanity's moral ethics if we point out them in front of audiences. This behavior not only can make the lecturer feel ashamed in public but also can have detrimental effects on his mental health. My personal experience is a compelling example of this issue. If my memory serves me right, when I was a junior in college I had to have a presentation about the history of Islamic architecture in the middle east in front of my classmates and also three of my professors. Besides having social anxiety, I had a lot of stress for my very first-time lecture at a semi-serious conference. Although I took pills beforehand to feel more relaxed, In the middle of my presentation, I started to stutter so badly that I almost mispronounced three different important keywords. One of my classmates, who will I never forgive, started laughing at me and shouting out the correct pronunciations. Even though I finished my presentation with a good grade, following that event, I got PTSD and it is so hard for me to speak in public. If he had not called my mistakes in public, I would not have suffered from this disorder for such a long time.
Furthermore, when people interrupt someone's speech, for any reason, it can harm his concentration and he would lose the coherence of the sentences. Taking my aforementioned horrible experience into account, after my classmate started laughing and telling me the correct words, not only it did not help me to have a better lecture but it also made me forget what I was talking about and lose the chain of my speech. This experience is a compelling example of how harmful behaviors can affect the meeting detrimentally and may cause unfortunate repercussions for the speaker, like receiving a bad grade or forgetting the rest of his speech.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that if we confront a mistake or incorrect information in a lecture, It is more polite to wait and remind the correct information at the speaker in a proper time. If the listeners interrupt the lecture, first, the lecturer might feel ashamed in front of the audience, and additionally, he might lose his concentration to hold his speech coherently.
- If you want to choose a purpose which one do you choose Helping other people Enhancing time management Improving physical well being and eating healthy food 90
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 3
- How do movies and television influence people s behavior Give reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- If you want to choose a purpose which one do you choose Helping other people Enhancing time management Improving physical well being and eating healthy food 76
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 272, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...icts humanitys moral ethics if we point out them in front of audiences. This behavi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, in conclusion, talking about, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85263157895 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06485682674 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501052631579 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.643046832 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.055555556 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3888888889 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.85842293907 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844811726403 0.236089414692 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0295381194178 0.076458572812 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309398444696 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068193351093 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372844837626 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.