when choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued whether a lucrative income in our job is the most crucial when deciding on a career. While I accept the apparent benefits of this idea, I believe that choosing a career should have additional purposes.
I concur that they must have money to cover their basic expenses. As an illustration, every one of us needs money to pay for necessities like rent, food, health care, and education. If people prioritize their income over their employment, it also enables them to meet their demands and have a reasonable quality of life. By contrast, choosing a job of hobbies, passion, or other non-financial factors instead of income, people might find it difficult to support themselves. Artists and musicians, for instance, are known for choosing a career path they love, but that does not always provide them with sufficient money to live comfortably and raise a family.
On the other hand, apart from the job's wage, I believe that aspects of the work also play an important role. The first one is that personal relationships and the atmosphere in a workplace are essential when choosing a job. Having a good manager or friendly colleagues, for instance, not only helps workers get over the moon, but also they can work more productively. Secondly, many people's job satisfaction comes from their professional achievements, the skills they learn, and the position they reach. Eventually, some people choose a career since they want to aid others and contribute something positive to society.
In conclusion, while picking a career just for financial gain is advantageous, I still firmly believe that people should acquire more functionality because doing so would enable them to become more successful and well-rounded.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems 61
- The chart below shows the number of the Internet users in three different countries and the world average between 1998 and 2013 78
- The graph below shows the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 78
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks 61
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14184397163 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8751933997 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620567375887 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8139241775 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.538461538 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119564966924 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478360594058 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500581544218 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0750292830891 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419388602072 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.