The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufactures in the years 2005 and 2006.
The table elucidates the mobile manufacture’s market share in the world market in a percentage for the period 2005 to 2006.
As it is observed from the table, Nokia had the largest market share (of almost 1/3 of total market share) in 2005 and it increased by 2.5% in 2006 to remain the largest mobile manufacturer in the world. The market share for Motorola is followed closely as it comprised over 17% in 2005 and their market share increased by 3.3%. Samsung had been able to maintain third position for their mobile phone market share, their share decreased to 11.8% in 2006 compared to 12.7% in the previous year. On the other hand, Sony Ericsson and Lg had more than 6% of its market share in 2005. In 2006, while the market shares for Sony increased by 1%, Lg’s market share declined. Lastly, market share for Ben Q was the least market share for both years and in 2006, the market share had gone down less than half. All other mobile manufacturers constituted of 19.2% of the market share in 2005 and that reduced to 16.2% in next year.
It is apparent that, Nokia recorded as the highest market share for two consecutive years in 2005 and 2006. The market share for Nokia, Motorola and Sony Ericsson had an incremental trend from 2005 to 2006 while others, Samsung, Lg and Ben Q had reduced in their market shares.
- Amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.
- Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- The diagram below illustrates the carbon cycle in nature 81
- The table below shows the monthly expenditure of an average Australian family in 1991 and 2001 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010 60
to maintain third position
to maintain the third position
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 239 200
No. of Characters: 1051 1000
No. of Different Words: 102 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.932 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.397 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.288 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 62 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 34 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 13 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.9 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.67 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.571 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.674 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.255 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4