Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children, while others think childcare centres provide the best care. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
These days, in most families, both parents spend a lot of time working at the office. Therefore, opinions are divided on whether grandparents are responsible for taking care of children or whether children should be taken to kindergarteners. While I understand the logic behind the former, I am still in favour of the latter.
Those who believe that other family members such as grandparents can help to take care of the children may have several arguments. They may well argue that grandparents can strengthen the relationship between them and their children. This is because grandparents can have more time to interact with their children which allows them to know more about their characters and hobbies. Another point worth mentioning is that grandparents can easily observe the growth of their children. As a matter of fact that at childcare centers, teachers have to care for two-three students which prevent them from observing the children's growth,
Nevertheless, I still believe that taking children to nursery schools is the best service care for several reasons. Chief among these is that schools have high-qualified teachers to know what should be taught to children and have a personal process for them. That result in the fact that children can develop all their skills which can help them to be more confident and mature. The second factor is that at school, there are many playgrounds for children. Therefore, they can not only make friends with other peers but also improve their physical health. Additionally, they can have opportunities to interact with their peers thereby bettering communication skills.
In conclusion, It is understandable why some may argue that children should be cared for by grandparents. However, I would agree that kindergarteners can do it better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | myhuyenueh94 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Lena Whalley | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Lena Whalley | 84 | view |
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
- Companies and private invididuals not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Agree or disagree 78
- Companies and private invididuals not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r, I am still in favour of the latter. Those who believe that other family memb...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m from observing the childrens growth, Nevertheless, I still believe that takin...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hereby bettering communication skills. In conclusion, It is understandable why ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23958333333 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92808405195 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545138888889 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4853895659 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306752781215 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100628601527 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065664340992 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174997830928 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563507690938 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.