The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The first diagram illustrates the layout of an industrial region located in the town of Norbition at the present, and the second shows some changes that will be made to this plan.
It is clear that the most noticeable modification will be the addition of some facilities and housing areas. Some changes will also involve the use of the space of some zones and the expansion of the road.
Looking at the diagram in more detail, we can see that there is a factory at the end of the road which is located at the east side of the original roundabout now, but this will be totally replaced to make way for a novel school in the future. Other industrial zones along this road are going to be demolished to make way for new housing areas. A playground will be constructed at the space between the mentioned road and the river, and a small route which will be in the middle of two new housing areas and lead to the playground is going to be added. It is also obvious that a new roundabout is going to be built on the bottom side of the initial rotary. Along the road between two roundabouts in the future, there will be new shops on the left and a medical centre on the right.
According to the plan, the roads are going to be expanded to the north initial rotary, and this will result in the destruction of a factory on the north of the rotary. The new route will be across the river and we will witness its expansion to the left and right, which will be accompanied by the construction of new housing areas on the farmland. It is remarkable that the factories on the west side of the rotary are going to be demolished to make way for the expansion of the road from the rotary to the north-west. There will be some residential areas that will be constructed around these new routes. No changes are going to be made to the original roundabout.
- Around the world many animal species become extinct Some people believe that countries and individuals must try to solve this problem Others believe that concentrating on problems of human is more important than those concerning species Discuss both views 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 67
- Natural resources such as oil forest and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate What problems does it cause How can we solve these problems 73
- Some people think history has nothing or little to tell us but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 75
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 7.0 386% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 1.00243902439 1397% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 965.302439024 155% => OK
No of words: 344.0 196.424390244 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35174418605 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45060553383 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.377906976744 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0547049525 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0508109336727 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249768775917 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351747388409 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0492132063361 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501387899011 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 7.0 386% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 1.00243902439 1397% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 965.302439024 155% => OK
No of words: 344.0 196.424390244 175% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35174418605 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45060553383 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.377906976744 0.547539520022 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 469.8 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0547049525 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4615384615 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92307692308 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0508109336727 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249768775917 0.103423049105 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351747388409 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0492132063361 0.15604864568 32% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501387899011 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.