QUESTION
Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Like every coin has two sides - the above statement also have two sides which are equally important and one cannot be neglected for the other. Farmland, housing, and industry is important for the humans and their livelihood, one cannot live without food, shelter and clothing and therfore, farming, building a shelter and industrialization for the economy cannot be neglected for saving the animals.
On the other side, we the humans are at least partly responsible for the endangering of the animals and therfore it also becomes our responsibility only to save the animals before they get extinct since the humans and animals are both part of the food cycle and ecosystem and we have to maintain optimum balance.
The humans should not interfere with deep forest leading to deforestation and disturbing the habitat of the animals. One of the main reasons are "Shifting agriculture" which means once the land has been used to its full use to produce the crops and now had become barren is useless for both humans and animals. Ever since the industrialization, the waste byproducts are sent to the water bodies that leads to create eutrophication and eventually affects the aquatic animals.
University of California research showed that the chemical used in the tires called 6PPD, when comes in contact with the air or gets oxidized produces another compound 6PPD-quinone and when the abraded tire releases the latter compound, it goes into the water bodies and which is killing the Coho Salmon fishes. The same fishes which human also eats or the pregnant women. Therefore, we are not just risking the animals or people but the future generation too. This is one of the examples how industrialization has not only affected the animals but also the humans.
Therefore, we should not maintain the balance in the ecosystem since both humans and animals are interdependent and we cannot lose one for another.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-28 | Mina.2020 | 76 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | MotherAstronaut | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Rapidbirthday21 | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Rapidbirthday21 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | cocoza@gmail.com | 87 | view |
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 66
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 66
- QUESTION Summarize the points in the lecture being sure to explain how they address the specific ideas about solar energy described in the reading passage READING PASSAGE Although it s a new technology solar energy provides benefits to the entire world Fi 70
- QUESTION Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answ 70
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...once the land has been used to its full use to produce the crops and now had become...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 315.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11746031746 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88667271201 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.1568268469 48.9658058833 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.545454545 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.6045352989 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206441455649 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756996844981 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510620397168 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109046766279 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265303679876 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 58.1214874552 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.01 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.002688172 190% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.