In comparison to the earlier centuries, society has accepted that knowledge is essentially crucial; thus, governments and communities offer a wide range of opportunities where an individual can expand their knowledge. However, one contentious debate is whether it is better to have in-depth knowledge of a subject or a general understanding of all areas. No one can dispute that each option has both advantages and disadvantages. However, if I had to pick, I would rather have a solid foundation in one area than broad knowledge of everything. I stand by my view for several reasons, which I will develop in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, if one is talented at one subject, one can determine their dreams and goals. Many students have difficulty finding their ambition and interests in school. Hence, many students come to college unprepared and hesitant about what to major in, and in most cases, their life plan stalls since they try to explore. However, if one is good at a particular field from an early age, one does not have to worry about it, and one can set their goal and reach it quickly. I must admit that my experience has significantly impacted how I feel about this issue. You see, at a young age, I was intrigued by magazines and articles since they contained interesting topics and illustrated creativity in diverse ways. After that peak of interest, I began to work hard in my writing creativity and student media club, which led me to decide to study communication and media during my university years.
On top of that, the potential to be a top player in a field allows for respect and recognition. Usually, people talented in many domains care about many departments, so it is challenging to succeed in one specialty. However, if one works hard in a specific major, one can become an expert in that field. Drawing from my sister's experience, although she is average in other subjects like language arts and biology, she is very good at math, so students and professors call her Ms. Albert Einstein. Students always ask her if they have a tricky math problem. Therefore, if one excels in one field like this, people will recognize and respect them.
To wrap up my argument, specializing in one area increases the acceptance rate for employment. For instance, if I have a doctorate in psychology, I would be able to compete against those that obtained a lower degree of education or even a broad comprehension of the field of medicine. Even if one has all kinds of knowledge of the branch of medicine, there is no dispute that their general knowledge in surgery would compete against a surgeon who studied and had experience in the operation room.
Based on the reasons mentioned, I firmly believe it is better to grow and excel in one field than in many.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject 90
- Your local government has just recently received a large donation from an anonymous donor to improve the community Almost everyone agrees that the money should be invested in building a new public facility Which of the following do you think your local go 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Friendship is more important to children than it is to adults 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage about deforestation 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'succeeding'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: succeeding
... many departments, so it is challenging to succeed in one specialty. However, if one works...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in most cases, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2318.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 480.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82916666667 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84384996772 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539583333333 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 750.6 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7806557464 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.363636364 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86363636364 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237986223511 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684633534675 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601119230928 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130309052461 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313958314119 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.