There are more young leaders today in all fields than in past. What are the reasons behind this? Do you think this is as positive or negative development?
It is true that we are seeing increased participation of young leaders in almost all the verticals. There are several factors that are the contributing in this trend, and we will be discussing those all in this essay. However, people's views are divided on this development but I believe that it is a positive sign and this trend has to be encouraged.
Nowadays, innovation has become an integral part of executing any idea not only in industry as well as in politics and social service. Therefore, it is imperative that a leader has to be dynamic and agile enough like who can oversee the outcome and strategies the process of implementation for better outcomes. Hence, It is one of driving factor which is making a young person to place in decision making spot. For an instance, lets take a glance at political campaign; earlier it used to be run like giving speech and pasting pamphlets across the city and it was costly and less effective, but if we take a look now, it has been transformed in to social media driven perception making process and it is more optimized and cost effective and sole reason behind this innovation is participation of early cadre of a political party in campaign.
As far as, implications of this development is concerned I accept it as a positive move because we make a process more effective it requires new talent induction that can bring new ideas to refine the existing one but at the same time seniors capabilities can not be overlooked they are also chipping in hand to hand by sharing their experience and valuable inputs. For example, a young leader is inducting new ideas but at the same time senior member also helping him/her out by supervising him on the basis of his/her past experience.
To conclude, there are several reasons behind youngers are getting appointed leadership positions nowadays than previously but the main reason behind it their capability of devising new ideas and ability of implementing them in short time span for better throughput. It is a good trend because it is bringing best outcome compare to older one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-27 | lokeshpareek87 | 78 | view |
- You have lost an item of value on a train Write a letter to the railway company In your letter 1 Describe the item 2 Explain where and when you lost it 3 Say what action you would like the company to take 73
- You have visited another city in your country Prior to the visit you requested some information from a tourist center but the information was incorrect Write a letter to the manager of the center and say What information you were looking for What was inco 73
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think that the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think that the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media Do you think it is the reason for the growth in the rate of juvenile crime What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...supervising him on the basis of his/her past experience. To conclude, there are several reas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'bringing the best'.
Suggestion: bringing the best
...ghput. It is a good trend because it is bringing best outcome compare to older one.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in short, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 7.48453608247 334% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 5.05154639175 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 32.9175257732 122% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 937.175257732 185% => OK
No of words: 358.0 206.0 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83519553073 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78870152857 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 127.690721649 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550279329609 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 290.88556701 196% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 16.3608247423 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.368571319 44.8134815571 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.363636364 76.5299724578 206% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 32.5454545455 16.8248392259 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 4.34317383033 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234265613101 0.216113520407 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845829178737 0.0766984524023 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645341752407 0.0603063233224 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143031755704 0.12726935374 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692931052492 0.0580467560999 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 8.37731958763 210% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 70.7449484536 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 7.45979381443 212% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 41.2886597938 213% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 8.54432989691 173% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...supervising him on the basis of his/her past experience. To conclude, there are several reas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'bringing the best'.
Suggestion: bringing the best
...ghput. It is a good trend because it is bringing best outcome compare to older one.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in short, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 7.48453608247 334% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 5.05154639175 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 32.9175257732 122% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.85567010309 311% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 937.175257732 185% => OK
No of words: 358.0 206.0 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83519553073 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 3.78020617076 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78870152857 2.54303337028 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 127.690721649 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550279329609 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 290.88556701 196% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 16.3608247423 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.368571319 44.8134815571 249% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.363636364 76.5299724578 206% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 32.5454545455 16.8248392259 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 4.34317383033 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234265613101 0.216113520407 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845829178737 0.0766984524023 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645341752407 0.0603063233224 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143031755704 0.12726935374 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692931052492 0.0580467560999 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 8.37731958763 210% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 70.7449484536 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 7.45979381443 212% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 7.59969072165 120% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 41.2886597938 213% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 8.54432989691 173% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.