The tables give information about sales of Fairtrade-labeled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The table shows the figures about the proportion of the money spent on Fairtrade-labeled coffee and bananas for a period of two years in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden. Overall, the sales fluctuated of Fairtrade coffee climbed in all five countries, particularly in the UK, whereas those of Fairtrade bananas only increased in three of the five nations in two years.
According to the provided data, in 1999, the amount of money spent on Fairtrade coffee and bananas was highest in Switzerland, at €3 million and €15 million, respectively. However, by 2004, sales of Fairtrade coffee of just €6 million was coming from Switzerland, whereas sales in the UK climbed dramatically by over €20 million. In the same year, Switzerland witnessed a significant growth in Fairtrade banana sales of over €47 million.
It can be seen that the money spent on two Fairtrade products was lower in three others nations. Although there had been slight improvements in Fairtrade coffee sales, overall revenue in all three nations remained at €2 million or less in both years. It's noticeable to observe that by 2004, sales of Fairtrade bananas actually decreased in Sweden and Denmark by €1 million and €0.9 million, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-04 | hananguyen | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-14 | faisal vhora | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | charlotte1412 | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | Sukeerty | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-01 | Hendria | 73 | view |
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money What is your opinion 61
- The tables give information about sales of Fairtrade labeled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses such as the food and drink industry Do you think the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 61
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The table gives information on consumers spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 937.175257732 112% => OK
No of words: 201.0 206.0 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22388059701 4.54256449028 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.78020617076 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89691542972 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 127.690721649 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532338308458 0.622605031667 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 290.88556701 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.0907842155 44.8134815571 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 76.5299724578 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 16.8248392259 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302698365155 0.216113520407 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143452655218 0.0766984524023 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625309157071 0.0603063233224 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217584784018 0.12726935374 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680178816021 0.0580467560999 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 8.37731958763 187% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 7.45979381443 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 8.71597938144 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.