I believe we both get to know more about international news and have a better understanding of what is happening. Means of communication have improved a lot compared to what they used to be, and we have never been as eager to share or watch news as today.
Development of mass printing technologies and the invention of newspaper has already been a choice of cheap and instant news for over a century. Modern telecommunications system made radio, TV and the Internet possible, which delivers news with almost no delay, no matter how far away it took place. On the other hand, if not fulfilled by paper and screen, one could always take a trip to where it happened if time permits. Thanks to advanced methods of transportation nowadays, jets and high-speed railways have made such an option viable.
News providers are motivated by globalization and international tourism. Countries establish state-owned or semi-public news agencies to share local news and help boost tourism among foreigners, or post views on various issues to gaining advantage during diplomatical disputes by attracting viewers from other countries and getting them more familiar with the country, thus more likely to stand on the same side. Companies find setting up private press departments more and more lucrative since it helps with promoting overseas sales of their goods and services and downplaying PR issues after an incident.
Besides changes on delivery and production of news, readers have evolved as well. Thanks to the general availability of public education, most of the time we already have some basic knowledge on an area's historical and political background before hearing about a piece of news happening there. More importantly, the global market puts pressure on investors and people with jobs linked to a certain field to put effort in grasping latest news about it, whether domestic or international, in order to keep up and survive instead of getting outdated and falling behind.
- People today are much better informed about international news than they were in the past 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today are much better informed about international news than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Practice and hard work are more important to an athlete s success than natural ability and talent Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- People today are much better informed about international news than they were in the past 90
- People today are much better informed about international news than they were in the past 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'telecommunications'' or 'telecommunication's'?
Suggestion: telecommunications'; telecommunication's
...instant news for over a century. Modern telecommunications system made radio, TV and the Internet ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an area' or simply 'areas'?
Suggestion: an area; areas
...we already have some basic knowledge on an areas historical and political background bef...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, thus, well, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 321.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18380062305 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92943573654 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657320872274 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.4432733913 48.9658058833 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.75 20.6045352989 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163672496892 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613512824829 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550075856511 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0985268277985 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568306048331 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.