The line graph gives information about the proportion of visitors to Scotland who travelled to 4 different attractions over the period 30 years from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the percentage of travellers who went to Castle and Zoo increased considerably. On the other hand, the proportion of tourists visiting Aquarium and Festival decreased remarkably over the period. It’s also noticable that the figures of visiting Castle that was the popular of 4 destinations.
Looking at the chart, starting with 30%, the festival where was the most attractive place in 1980. But then it continued to decrease and the final figure reached just under 20% in 2010. In addition, the figure of tourists visited to Aquarium started with 20%, after some fluctuations, it reduced moderately from 1980 to 2010 to about 10%, which was the lowest percentage of the period.
Remaining to the different places, the percentage of visitors visiting to the Castle progressed significantly approximately 10% between 1980 and 2010, at nearly 40%. About the Zoo, starting at only 10%, which was the lowest figure in 1980, but then it oscillated from 1980 to 2000, the final zoo went up considerably at 20% in 2010.
- To succeed in a business one needs to be good at maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The charts show information about children learning musical instruments in 1996 and 2016 in the UK 75
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The following pie chart shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two different years
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08542713568 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83796388973 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527638190955 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2712863388 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193828507296 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842263578866 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911926330118 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141607198845 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107447620924 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.