The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
* The difference of public park plan in 1920 and as today has been shown by the rendered two maps of grange park.
Turning to the details, in 1920, there was a stage for musicians in the East side of the park which has renovated into amphitheater for concerts currently. Also, rose gardens which were on different places in the park recently, enlarged in the centre of the park alongwith sitting area by removing fountain.
Strolling further, at the North- West corner of the park, cafe and children playing area introduced at the place of rose garden and pond. Moreover, glass house are converted into water feature. But entrance of the park remain same at the North and South direction of the park except underground car parking which is newly constructed.
Overall, it can be seen that park has been transformed remarkably by addition of new features but entrance of the park are on same place.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 89
- some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher Others think that it is always better to have a teacher Which one do you prefer 73
- The charts below show the distribution of worlds water and the use of water in three countries 84
- In the last century when a human astronaut arrived on the moon he said it is a big step for mankind But some people say it makes little or no difference to our daily life To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y the rendered two maps of grange park. Turning to the details, in 1920, there w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with sitting area by removing fountain. Strolling further, at the North- West c...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...car parking which is newly constructed. Overall, it can be seen that park has be...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84516129032 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54475876517 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.651612903226 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8677112515 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347455165589 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163896165364 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118000360345 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233400402986 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877432770524 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.