The given bar chart compares the proportion of women in five different age brackets who had their first child in Australia in three separate years (1966, 1986 and 2006).
Overall, it can be seen that for all figures the overall trend was upward except for two younger age brackets. In addition, the majority of women had their first child in their 20s in 1966 and 1986, while the 30-34 age group recorded the highest rates in 2006.
Turning to the chart for details, in 1966, about 63% of Australian women gave birth to their first baby, compared to about 35% of those under 19. During the next 40 years, those figures dropped significantly to nearly 28% and 12%. By contrast, the figure for those aged 25-30 increased minimally from about 36% to 38% despite a dramatic growth to 50% in 1986.
Among other groups, those aged 30-34 initially rose dramatically from almost 12% in the first year to a peak of roughly 45% in the final year. Likewise, an over three-fold rise was recorded in that of 34-to-39-year-old women from 8% to about 30%. The figure for those over 40 also increased slightly from just 3% to about 5% despite a small dip in 1986.
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 73
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 78
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009. 73
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60487804878 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40332904153 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59512195122 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.342103745 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322697715437 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137654483665 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126150261155 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220266290948 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872049495867 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, likewise, so, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60487804878 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40332904153 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59512195122 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.342103745 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322697715437 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137654483665 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126150261155 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220266290948 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872049495867 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.