The bar chart draws a comparison of the amount of time spent on online conversation and creations by teenagers in the UK.
Looking at the graph, it clearly seen that the boys allocated much more time for playing console games than the girls while the number of hours spent on chatting on the Internet by females was higher than the others.
Around 4% of boys in a school spent 4 hours on engaging online conversation which was three times lower than that of spending on their creations while the amount of time allocated 4 hours and at least one hour on chatting on the internet by males accounted for nearly 24% and 25% respectively, compared to 43% and 30% of boys who spent their time on playing console games.
The percentage of female teenagers who allocated from 1 to 3 hour for engaging conservation on the internet made up roughly 35% which was over twice higher than that of spending on their creations while there was four times as much the proportion of girls spent four hours on online conservation as their creations. The figure for allocating at least one hour on playing games by females was higher than their online conservation, at 38% and 25% respectively.
- Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary because students can get so much information through the Internet and study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary because students can get so much information through the Internet and study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage more peo 73
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unt of time spent on online conversation and creations by teenagers in the UK. ...
^^
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt on online conversation and creations by teenagers in the UK. Looking at the...
^^
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onversation and creations by teenagers in the UK. Looking at the graph, it cle...
^^
Line 2, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n that the boys allocated much more time for playing console games than the girls...
^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ys in a school spent 4 hours on engaging online conversation which was three time...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree times lower than that of spending on their creations while the amount of time...
^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ile the amount of time allocated 4 hours and at least one hour on chatting on the...
^^
Line 4, column 62, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
...ale teenagers who allocated from 1 to 3 hour for engaging conservation on the inter...
^^^^
Line 4, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teenagers who allocated from 1 to 3 hour for engaging conservation on the interne...
^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or engaging conservation on the internet made up roughly 35% which was over twice...
^^
Line 4, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er twice higher than that of spending on their creations while there was four ti...
^^
Line 4, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding on their creations while there was four times as much the proportion of gir...
^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur times as much the proportion of girls spent four hours on online conservation ...
^^
Line 4, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ating at least one hour on playing games by females was higher than their online ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70048309179 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62497159167 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449275362319 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.7200081867 43.030603864 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 194.6 112.824112599 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.4 22.9334400587 181% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169434256912 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113193103129 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512516151623 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131688476469 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405552745473 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.87 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.