The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables, sugars and sweets, and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009.

A glance at the line graph provided illustrates some information about the changes in prices of three different food product groups in the USA during the period from 1978 to 2009.

Overall, it is clear that the prices for all three different food product groups increased over 30-year period, but only the increase in fresh fruits and vegetables is significantly higher than the rise in overall trend in consumer-price index throughout the period shown.

It can be seen from the graph that all lines have the same starting figure in 1979. The consumer-price index increase steadily from around 60 in 1979 to approximately 220 in 2009. Although the prices for sugar and sweets and carbonated drinks showed the similar trend in a term decline general, they were consistently below the consumer-price index after 1987. The price for sugar and sweets was 200 in 2009, higher than the final figure for carbonated drinks at the end of this period.

Prices also rose for the fresh fruits and vegetables, although it fluctuated. From the same number of 60 at the start of period, it increase sharply to more than 330 on the index in 2009.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-25 Sharan Kaur 78 view
2019-10-09 kissbiss 73 view
2019-10-08 kissbiss 73 view
2019-09-17 Bao Trang 73 view
2019-08-13 dearatyp 84 view
Essays by user Bao Trang :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...number of 60 at the start of period, it increase sharply to more than 330 on the index i...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89119170984 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66364585897 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538860103627 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2233878859 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323386509928 0.215688989381 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14499088868 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891631688863 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182372131126 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065313991245 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.