The given line graph compares USA ,Japan, Sweden in term of the number of people who are over 65 from 1940 to 2040.
From basic observation, there was a upward fluctuation in the percentage of Sweden and USA' population aged over 65. Moreover, according to current prediction, this figure for all countries will have a growth.
From 1940 to 2000 there was gradually increase in the percentage of people over 65 in USA and Sweden, followed by a steady decline. Whereas ,a slight reduce of 3% was seen in the figure for Japan in the same period. Ferom the beginning of 2000 until the present, the number of population aged 65 in Sweden likewise that in USA had a small jump. By contrast this figure for USA had no changes.
Over the period of prediction, proportion of population aged 65 in three countries will have a progress. Especially Japan, in 2040 it is expected to upsurge suddenly over the next 20 years and this touch the highest point among the 3 figures, at 27% even though it started at the lowest point of all . In addition , in 2040 , this figure for japan will be double of that in the present.
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 56
- Some people think that people should be given right use of fresh water as they like Others believe governments should control toughly over the use of fresh water Discuss both view and give your own opinion 67
- The table below shows percentage of students giving good ratings for different aspects of a university in China in 2000 2005 2010 67
- Most university graduates earn more money than less well educated people Some people argue that this means they should pay the full cost of their education To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
The given line graph compares USA ,Japan, Sweden in term of the number of ...
^^
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n line graph compares USA ,Japan, Sweden in term of the number of people who are ...
^^
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...040. From basic observation, there was a upward fluctuation in the percentage of...
^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n, followed by a steady decline. Whereas ,a slight reduce of 3% was seen in the fi...
^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...on aged 65 in three countries will have a progress. Especially Japan, in 2040 it is expec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untries will have a progress. Especially Japan, in 2040 it is expected to upsurge...
^^
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ighest point among the 3 figures, at 27% even though it started at the lowest poi...
^^
Line 4, column 301, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...gh it started at the lowest point of all . In addition , in 2040 , this figure for...
^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at the lowest point of all . In addition , in 2040 , this figure for japan will be...
^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...est point of all . In addition , in 2040 , this figure for japan will be double of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, moreover, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51115591911 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8201004758 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195319504016 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863214676113 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608245237206 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131010043138 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346981869232 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.