Certain old buildings are more worth preserving than other ones. Which types of old building should be preserving. Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Preserving old buildings offers more work than the other ones. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of certain old buildings are more worth preserving the structure are believed to equalize preserve history opportunities among people regardless of their background. This preserving support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall visitors enrollment rate of other people in many countries but also to mitigate waste to the environment from construction works. Furthermore, these ancient building can be regarded as architecture masterpieces that offer valuable insight into the history and development of human civilization. Second, preserving ancient buildings would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and cherish local history or preserving old buildings is imperative to foster the economic growth and technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor once preserving old buildings. First, the preservation of ancient buildings would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from architecture cost and building new project, architecture could become over-reliant in the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as the healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, preserving old building would waste more time for many people have responsibilities for that job including those who are not want to spent more time or show no interest in preserving building pursuits, thereby adding great burdens for government admission and organizations and potentially wasting time that these people could have spent pursuing more suitable building paths.
In conclusion, the preservation ancient building have some advantages but this essay seems to me that would given disadvantages outweigh advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-17 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- Some people use technology or internet for keep in touch with others and get new events Do you think that is advantage outweigh disadvantage 89
- The maps illustrated about the coastal land develops to a coastal park before development and after development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 67
- The table shows the information of total health expenditure per capita in five countries in 2019 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 10
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
... tends not only to increase the overall visitors enrollment rate of other people in many...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
...s but this essay seems to me that would given disadvantages outweigh advantages.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81107491857 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09134078778 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8699577131 49.4020404114 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.666666667 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5833333333 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411520346549 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162265200299 0.084324248473 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106299578266 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255775956723 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369833456493 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.