In the future, there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries. Is it a positive or negative effects
It is said that in recent times with the development of many countries around the world. Many scientists that in the future the percentage of elder people will be higher than young people. Although this trend can be have some advantages, the drawbacks may be far more significant.
On the one hand, there can be some minor benefits of significant proportion of older people. First and foremost, elder people have a lot of experience as well as soft skills which can help them to solve the problems of the employees easier. For example, in many big enterprises the leaders are usually old people because the can convey their knowledge to the younger generations. However, the older people can also be a burden for the budget of many nations. The reason for this is that they when they entire, they can not pay for the taxes which can lead to the decrease to the national budget. Furthermore, the nations also need to invest money in building health care centers.
On the other hand, there can be some major downsides of lower percentage of young people in many countries. Perhaps one of these is that there are not enough young employees to do the physical works. As a matter of fact, young people have better health which can allow them to work in extreme conditions better. The second issue is that there will be an decrease in number of children were born in the future which can lead to adverse effects to the society. For example, in Japan, they now face with the this problem and try to solve it.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that enormous number of elder people can be beneficial in some situations. However, the drawbacks involved are greater significance.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
2023-01-28 | tranlequihoang | 56 | view |
- Companies and private invididuals not government should pay to clean up the pollution that they produced 50
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Agree or disagree 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Agree or disagree 78
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... The second issue is that there will be an decrease in number of children were bor...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: DT_DT[2]
Message: Maybe you need to remove the second determiner so that only 'the' or 'this' is left.
Suggestion: the; this
...r example, in Japan, they now face with the this problem and try to solve it. In concl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, so, well, for example, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72260273973 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51643826295 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503424657534 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6843063708 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.1875 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314452239242 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109833819573 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115509322682 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204416259269 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901147780933 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.