explore the north pole
The passage asserts that there are three powerful argumnts which show the Robert Peary reached to the North pole. The professor states that mentioned reasons by the passage are not solid and they are unconvincing, and she rejects each arguments provided by the passage.
First, the article claims that the National Geographic committee reveals that Peary reached to the Pole, since they found some records and equipments of him. The lecture, on the contrary, debunks this point by explaining that it is true that commitee reported this records, but they were some close friends of Peary in the commitee who were not biased regarding to the results, and they fund the research by money.
Second, the time of travel to North Pole was repeated by another advanturer named Tom Avery traveled in same way Peary took by dogsled, according to the reading. The professor rebuts this view by reasoning that Avery reached to the North pole by airplane not on feet, and also the weather condition was very different than that of Peary time and he travelled in a diverse way.
Third, the article imparts that Measuring the position of sun in shadow in photo taken by Peary in North Pole is another reason which shows he reached the Pole. The lecture disavows this point by explaining that scientists examined these shadows precisely, and shadows were fuzzy and unfocused, since after hundreds years the photo were blured and those pictures did not show position of sun accurately
- A recent national survey found that the majority of workers with access to the Internet at work had used company computers for personal or recreational activities, such as banking or playing games. In an effort to improve our employees' productivity, we s 40
- All nations should help support the development of a global university designed to engage students in the process of solving the world s most persistent social problems 63
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing."During the past year, Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on-the-job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Exper 40
- more cars in streets 70
- doing projects in group or alone 70
The professor states that mentioned reasons by the passage are not solid
The professor states that the mentioned reasons by the passage are not solid
Sentence: and they are unconvincing, and she rejects each arguments provided by the passage.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to each and arguments
did not show position of sun accurately
did not show the position of sun accurately
Sentence: The passage asserts that there are three powerful argumnts which show the Robert Peary reached to the North pole.
Error: argumnts Suggestion: arguments
Sentence: The lecture, on the contrary, debunks this point by explaining that it is true that commitee reported this records, but they were some close friends of Peary in the commitee who were not biased regarding to the results, and they fund the research by money.
Error: commitee Suggestion: committee
Sentence: Second, the time of travel to North Pole was repeated by another advanturer named Tom Avery traveled in same way Peary took by dogsled, according to the reading.
Error: advanturer Suggestion: adventurer
Sentence: The professor rebuts this view by reasoning that Avery reached to the North pole by airplane not on feet, and also the weather condition was very different than that of Peary time and he travelled in a diverse way.
Error: rebuts Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: The lecture disavows this point by explaining that scientists examined these shadows precisely, and shadows were fuzzy and unfocused, since after hundreds years the photo were blured and those pictures did not show position of sun accurately
Error: blured Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
are you sure this sentence is correct?
but they were some close friends of Peary in the commitee who were not biased regarding to the results,
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 8 12
No. of Words: 247 250
No. of Characters: 1198 1200
No. of Different Words: 130 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.964 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.85 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.306 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 79 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 69 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 40 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 22 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30.875 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.1 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.443 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.742 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.211 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4