One field study or outside expertise
Advancement in the science need to have information about diverse topics. I agree with this idea that people need to have at least expertise in one field to deepen the perception for progress in science and technology. To support this idea there are some respects.
First of all, there are interdisciplinary fields which need a wide range of expertise to work together since they can manage a project correctly. Take an engineer who wants to create a new device to find potential areas under ground. He should be familiar with numerous backgrounds such as, geology, petroleum and core sciences in the engineering. All these fields and expertise help him to deepen his view about problems face in this way. Pondering this point makes some aspects of the innovation clear to the inventor to find best way to get his aim.
Second, helping from other experts to study and research is must since it is cost-effective. Get information from other sources and people need much more money which fails the projects. For instance, in these days no one presents information to other by free because he or she devotes time and money for getting it. It is beneficial to scientists which provide more resources to broaden their horizon about various fields needed to succeed. In the rapidly changing environments of sciences and technology enriching information is much easier than it was in the past since there is a must to get information from diverse sources.
Third, apart from two forgoing reasons, it is should be considered, sometimes facilities and instruments in laboratories and companies are limited and people no longer can provide more data by themselves. Since they need to have information in only one field and get information from them to save money and time because making expertise in some fields need a long time of research and study to find different aspects of specified topic. For example, one astronaut never has enough information in aerodynamic and physics and chemistry since all those fields need over ten years to expertise.
To conclude, evaluating some aspects of one or more expertise in research have some advantageous and disadvantageous. However, I believe that having specialties in different fields is a wise option since it is cost and time effective and leads to better understanding of problems and details of projects and research.
- integrated writing about decline in birds' population 83
- future job: study hard or make great connection independent 60
- A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that number is nearly 80 percent. Another study, however, 70
- sound of submarines 80
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing."During the past year, Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on-the-job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries, where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours. Exper 40
is must
is a must
It is beneficial to scientists which provide more resources
It is beneficial to scientists who provide more resources
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: ? out of 6 //we need a complete essay topic to evaluate the essay accurately.
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 390 350
No. of Characters: 1937 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.444 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.967 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.803 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 132 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 51 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.185 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.322 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.556 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.111 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5