The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The line graph gives information about the percentage of elderly people aged 65 and over in 3 different countries and how this rate changed over 80 years from 1940 to 2040.
What stands out from the graph is that there are 4 similar trends, which progress gradually. It’s also noticeable that the figure of citizens aged 65 and more than in Japan is the lowest proportion during most of the period, but the data shows the highest percentage in the last year.
Looking at the graph for more details, it can be seen that the figure for population in Japan started at only 5% in 1940. whereas the percentage of citizens in sweden and usa were higher than the proportion of japan, which were 7% and 9% respectively. Over the next 60 years, the figures for elderly people in Sweden and usa improved steadily and stopped at about 15% in 2000. meanwhile, the population in Japan reduced slightly before the figures went up gradually to about 5% like the first time in 2000.
According to the current prediction, the percentage of the population in USA remained statically from 2000 to 2020, but then it will be climbed up continuously to 23% in 2040. Similarly, the proportion of elderly people in Japan will be progressed significantly to almost 20% at the same time. Finally, the figures of citizens in Sweden will be fluctuated between 2000 and 2020, but then it will be continued to increase to about 25% at the last year of the chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
- The bar chart shows the information of the number of volunteers and paid workers in 4 different roles in the sports sector of an Australian town in 2015 73
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- Children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe that children should be free to do what they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...on in Japan started at only 5% in 1940. whereas the percentage of citizens in sweden an...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...adily and stopped at about 15% in 2000. meanwhile, the population in Japan reduced slight...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, similarly, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66929133858 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58453697201 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503937007874 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.986448651 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156737662416 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649814883533 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700634452778 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120023916538 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845700291641 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.