Some students take a year off between school and universuty to work or to travel. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, many students choose to take a year off before starting to go to university. Although taking part in a gap year brings some drawbacks, I still believe that its benefits outweigh the drawbacks in the long term.
On the one hand, various reasons explain why there is no future for having a gap year for several difficulties. First and foremost, students may suffer from the feeling of being left behind. While their friends have just graduated and have had stable jobs, they still struggle with testing and learning. Delaying academic progress caused by spending a year off school poses a heavy burden on students who want to catch up with their peers. Furthermore, people only work on the assumption that they will take advantage of your experience. But a gap year contains challenges if you do not learn anything. Therefore, one previous year may be lost.
It seems to me that taking a gap year brings various positive effects on young students. Students can experience real jobs and skills which are not taught at universities. For instance, students can work with experts in particular fields to learn worthy lessons and become more mature. As a result, it is essential to take part in the practical experience instead of complicated theory. Nevertheless, after undergoing the competitive national exam, students have chances to relieve stress and then join voluntary activities. Therefore, a comfortable and willing attitude can get knowledge more effectively than those who go to university right away.
To conclude, not only students should focus on financial growth, but also they need to be responsive toward their relationship with their parents. I believe that it has both pros and cons.
- The diagram below shows how electricty is generated in a hydroelectronic power station 61
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- Making wool 84
- Some people think that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries shops and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, while, for instance, in particular, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09964412811 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74320675822 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64768683274 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7742084076 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2941176471 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236550514895 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669640430234 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535225562077 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133811599704 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756036596246 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.