The provided table displays the car production figures of Argentina, Australia, and Thailand from 2003 to 2006.
Overall, all three countries experienced an upward trend in their car production, except for Australia. Notably, Thailand emerged as the leading country in terms of car manufacturing throughout the given period.
Upon analyzing the data in greater detail, it can be observed that Thailand had an overwhelming car production rate with 735,852 units, whereas Argentina had the lowest number with only 235,088 cars made. Although the number of cars produced in Thailand peaked at 1,162,356 units in the next three years, it subsequently dropped slightly to 999,963 units. Meanwhile, Argentina experienced a considerable growth in its car manufacturing, finishing in second place with 466,089 cars produced.
Regarding Australia, it was the second-highest car producer in 2003, manufacturing 452,163 units. This number, however, fell slightly over the following 3 years, before plunging to 245,624 units in 2009, which is a doubled decrease from the 2003 figure.
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage more peo 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 73
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, second, whereas, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64814814815 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9947688477 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679012345679 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8560832791 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190690870902 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851402530774 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257898379289 0.0843802449381 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120022575329 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158458729423 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.