. The pie charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008.
The pie charts give information about how adults spent their time on various daily activities in a particular country between 1958 and 2008.
In general, adults consumed most of their time working and sleeping, while other interests and playing sports were the lowest. It can be seen that all categories of activities had an increase on the chart, except sleeping and gathering family and friends.
In the first year, working was the highest percentage of people spent on, and 1% more than the figure for sleeping, at 33% and 32%, respectively. There was a slight climb to 9% in the proportion of working, while sleeping time declined dramatically by 7% in 2008. 4% of the daily time adults consumed relaxing at home was less in 1958 than in 2008.
In 1958, the amount of time spent on other interests and playing sports was three times as much as commuting to work. Commutes to workplaces saw the most significant change, quadrupling from 2% to 8%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-07-08 | Sajib Ahamed | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-21 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-22 | Tung lam | 78 | view |
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is bteer like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from suagr cane 61
- Life cycle and anatomy of a lady bird 41
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82317073171 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61637950255 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.8742857026 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374791101486 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148564352071 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124752944163 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22948876372 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124225704831 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.42 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.