The chart compares the proportion of young people in higher education in 4 nations from 2000 to 2010.
It can be seen that for all figures the overall trend was upward. In addition, the figure for country D recorded the highest percentage of young people in higher education.
Turning to the chart for more details, in 2000, young people in university in country B accounted for 40% of the total number of people, compared to about 45% that in country D. The highest percentage of young people in higher education was recorded in country D over the period(60%), while country B registered the lowest figures in the last five years(40%)
In 2000, there was 35% of young people attended University country A, which was lower in country C(42%). In the next five years that in country C accounted for 48 % and remained stable until the last year of the period, while those in country A were significantly higher(58%).
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 67
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Internet access helps young people and workers achieve their education and work goals more easily than before To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The charts below show the distribution of the world s water and the use of water in three countries 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75949367089 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57056574229 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.179927488 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277900884242 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173964947875 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159431312704 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228912839957 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150343907546 0.0819641961636 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.