The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999.
The given line chart below illustrates that how many people in America and Japan were jobless from March 1993 to March 1999.
Overall, it is clear that initially, the unemployment rate in US was highest, while the reverse was true for japan. However, these two countries followed an opposite trend and equalized each other at the end of the period.
According to the graph, in March 1993, almost 7% of the workforce in US had no occupation, whereas japan stood at 2.5%. After this, their ratio in both countries fluctuated and moved steadily in the opposite direction. In the next year, the figure for America dropped to 6.5% and then to 6% until 1995, while the japan encountered a growth in their unemployed people which escalated to just over 3.5% in the same two years. Furthermore, the US has experienced a further 1% decline in an unoccupied professionals in 1997, becoming 5% which then plateaued until 1999. However, after a substantial increase in unemployment in japan, its percentage climbed significantly by reaching to the same level as US in 1998 at 5%. And then remain unchanged in the following year, despite up and downs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 89 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | InamAli | 93 | view |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view | |
| 2022-05-30 | Dhvani Bhanushali | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 73
- Creative artist should always be given the freedom to express their own ideas in words pictures music or film in whichever way they wish There should be no government restrictions on what they do To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 74
- The graph shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91237113402 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7613330376 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634020618557 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6277045757 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321897440901 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112761040761 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115386002782 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216606271281 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0895204737658 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.