The chart compares the proportion of young people in higher education in 4 nations from 2000 to 2010.
It can be seen that for all figures the overall trend was upward, except for country B. In addition, country D had the highest percentage of young people in higher education.
Turning to the chart for more details, in 2000, university attendees in country B accounted for 40% of its population, compared to about 45% that in country D. Over the next 10 years, the proportion of young people in university in country D peaked at about 60%, while that in country B remained unchanged and finished at 40% despite a small dip in 2005.
Regarding the other remaining, in 2000, there was 35% of young people attending University in country A, which was significantly lower than in country C(42%). During the followinh ten years, that in country C climbed to finish at 48 % before remained stable in 2005 , while those in country A recorded an enormous growth to 58% in the final year.
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 89
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Task 1 The table below gives information about values of the exports of Kiwi fruit from New Zealand to five countries between 2010 and 2012 Unit NZ 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...h at 48 % before remained stable in 2005 , while those in country A recorded an e...
^^
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2005 , while those in country A recorded an enormous growth to 58% in the final y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71511627907 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62744265052 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587209302326 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2128098922 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245067315958 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147098472749 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151515026672 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202580469387 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155082103653 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.