The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Inventions and advancement in technology is ongoing process and is inevitable. The prompt states that human mind will always be superior to machines as machines are only the result of the thinking of human mind which is totally agreeable for several reasons.
Firstly, humans make inventions like machines with a sole purpose of maximum utilization of human mind and time so that time spend in mundane tasks will be reduced and we can spend more time in productive things. For instance, the invention of calculator has reduced our time in calculation tremendously. Earlier people required time calculating simple every day calculations like profit and loss manually but with the invention of calculator calculations are done in seconds. This does not mean that calculator is superior to human mind as the algorithms and circuits used in the calculator are simply the result of intensive thinking of a human mind and hence the human mind will always be superior to machines.
Secondly, humans also made autopilot features in planes but it does not mean that it can outperform plane driven manually by a trained piolet. Several cases of flight emergency are observed where the pilot went against the machines suggestion and tackled the emergency based on the human instinct and problem solving skill and performed better than what a machine may have performed. This shows that machines can give solutions to solve complex problems but decision whether to execute according to the machine output rests on human mind.
While some may disagree to the claim that the advancement in AI (Artificial Intelligence) and ML (Machine Learning) can result in machine outperforming humans in every field, but currently these advancements are not enough to prove that machines are superior to human mind and the fact that the algorithms written in AI and ML are human made shows that there surely be some aspects or conditions in which the machine will depend on humans being the creator of machines and hence my view is more agreeable.
To conclude, the advancement in machines are currently far from exceeding the human intelligence and there is a line after which human thinking and knowledge is required and machines are just tools that makes our lives efficient and easy to do our banal tasks and hence human mind will always be superior to machines.
- Collectors prize the ancient life size clay statues of human figures made on Kali lsland but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such real 1stic precision Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human hea 60
- Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have complained indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change Furthermore many server 58
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will in 68
- A nation should require all of its student to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'machines'' or 'machine's'?
Suggestion: machines'; machine's
...served where the pilot went against the machines suggestion and tackled the emergency ba...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0829015544 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6814159837 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.624072996 60.3974514979 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.363636364 118.986275619 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0909090909 23.4991977007 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.592415925349 0.243740707755 243% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23964797924 0.0831039109588 288% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206071476328 0.0758088955206 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3898333968 0.150359130593 259% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986965087489 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 14.1392134831 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.1743820225 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'machines'' or 'machine's'?
Suggestion: machines'; machine's
...served where the pilot went against the machines suggestion and tackled the emergency ba...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0829015544 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6814159837 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466321243523 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 23.0359550562 152% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.624072996 60.3974514979 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.363636364 118.986275619 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0909090909 23.4991977007 149% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.592415925349 0.243740707755 243% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.23964797924 0.0831039109588 288% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206071476328 0.0758088955206 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3898333968 0.150359130593 259% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986965087489 0.0667264976115 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 14.1392134831 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.95 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 12.1743820225 139% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 11.2143820225 143% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.