The maps below show the layouts of the nature Museum between 2010 and 2013.
The two maps give information about the change in the layout of the nature museum between 2010 and 2013.
In general, it can be seen that the layout of the museum significantly changed with the addition of new displays and facilities and the relocation of particular rooms. The square of the museum was expanded.
In 2010, visitors went through the entrance near a large garden before passing the ticket desk in the lobby room. To the left of the lobby area was the dinosaur display, while the mammal exhibition was located behind the dinosaur. The ocean hall was found directly behind the lobby.
By 2013, the square of the museum was expanded to the right-hand side with the disappearance of the garden to make way for additional displays such as a human origins display, a coffee shop, a shop, and mammals. The room, which previously housed the mammal display was fitted out with a new display on the Ice Age where an insect area was constructed at the corner of the rooms. The ocean hall, lobby, and dinosaur rooms stayed unchanged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-14 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is it a negative or positive development 89
- The picture below shows the differences in the layout of conference center in 2010 and 2025 61
- The production technique of red wine 84
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult Others believe that it is getting easier Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75690607735 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47312714282 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574585635359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5746633807 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180165160281 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906644886153 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154645894072 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175701966608 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.199194515546 0.0819641961636 243% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.