The given table compares the percentage of children with different educational struggles in schools A and B in 2 distinguished years.
It is noticeable from the table that school A had more students with educational trouble than school B in both years. However, while school A had a decrease in the percentage of most of the problems, school B saw an overall rise in the incidence of struggling pupils between 2005 and 2015.
In 2005, 22% and 24% of students in school A found it difficult in reading and handwriting, respectively. These figures for school B were significantly less, 8% and 7%. There 30-40% of children in school A had trouble with spelling, listening skills, verbal expression of ideas, concentration in lessons, and following instructions while only 5-15% of students in school B had the same problems in the year 2005.
The proportion of students who had trouble in 7 categories in 2015 witnessed a less minimal difference between schools A and B in 2005. In school A, apart from the percentage of areas in reading ability and handwriting remained relatively stable at 23% and 28%, the rest of the figures had a dramatic decrease. There were 25%, 20%, 21%, 18%, and 18% of children having problems with spelling, listening skills, verbal expression of ideas, concentration in lessons, and following instructions, respectively. On the other hand, from 2005 to 2015, school B experienced a double proportion of students who could not spell and follow instructions easily. Besides, almost the rest of the figures for school B saw a slight rise. The incidence of the students struggling in reading, handwriting, listening, verbal expression of ideas, and concentrating in lessons were 9%, 7%, 12%, 15%, and 15%, respectively.
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 67
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 67
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, while, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1013986014 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11950235276 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468531468531 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8037119322 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208748251794 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904002543395 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463635763409 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154306922753 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180583263862 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.