The table below shows the percentages of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011.
The table demonstrates the proportion of inhabitants who rode cycle, by age range and gender in 2011.
Overall, children under 9 years old accounted for the highest percentage of cyclists. Also, the percentage of females who use bicycles was higher than that of males in all age groups.
It can generally be seen that an inhabitant’s age increases, they tend to bicycle less. The percentage of people who rode bicycles reached a peak at the age group of children under 9 years old, with 51.4% of females compared to 50.3% of males. Following by the age range of 10 to 17 years old, the data of women and men cyclists were 42.2% and 24.6%, respectively.
It is noticeable that the figure for female cyclists at the age groups of 18-39 years old which stood at 17.1 percent, was larger than 9.7 percent of males. 12,3 percent of women using cycles which was a little higher than the percentage of men which was 8.0 percent between 40 to 59 years old. However, these figures rose slightly to 18.5% in the case of females and 13.2% in case of males.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | view | |
| 2023-10-13 | nguyenkhangtriem | 40 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 78
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60106382979 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5183965506 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3457542202 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1111111111 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221051442174 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10464326141 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918813848553 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169929049533 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.080301519217 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.