New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
It is believed that new technologies affect the activities children do in their leisure time in both positive and negative aspects. In my opinion, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages and I will explain my views.
On the one hand, technology is really helpful in our lives. First of all, children tend to enjoy playing online games and these games develop their cognitive abilities. Quiz games or strategic games, for instance, require children to be able to make decisions in different situations and be good at logical thinking. They not only improve problem-solving skills but also help them deal with any sudden situations. Moreover, thanks to enormous and available sources of online information, young people profit from early interaction with the Internet. They can widen their horizons when looking for foreign articles, joining in online courses and it is easy for them to satisfy their curiosity.
On the other hand, smart devices also bring some drawbacks. One major disadvantage is that children spending time on computer games are unwilling to take part in outdoor activities and do exercises. The less exercises they do, the more illnesses they will have. It is the reason for obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease formation. Beside that, if children constantly spend most of their time on the Internet, they will be addicted. Some games allure them to continue playing for hours, such as role-playing games, which require people to stay in front of the screen for some hours so as to complete all the missions.
To sum up, while there are some benefits of electronic applications for children, I opine that the negative effects are more remarkable
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 11
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The charts below show the proportion of the energy produced from different sources in a country between 1985 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison
- Some people think that the government should ban dangerous sports but others think that people should have freedom to do whatever sport activities they choose Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun exercises is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...utdoor activities and do exercises. The less exercises they do, the more illnesses t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...y in front of the screen for some hours so as to complete all the missions. To sum up,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, really, so, while, as to, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19926199262 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79838638396 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4488073269 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217091887971 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706337302284 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077182075891 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140449234081 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999381053017 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun exercises is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...utdoor activities and do exercises. The less exercises they do, the more illnesses t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...y in front of the screen for some hours so as to complete all the missions. To sum up,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, really, so, while, as to, for instance, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19926199262 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79838638396 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623616236162 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4488073269 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217091887971 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706337302284 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077182075891 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140449234081 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999381053017 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.