Governments give a lot of support to artists, even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Governments often allocate funds to support artists, but some people argue that this money could be better spent on more pressing issues. While I recognize the validity of this viewpoint, I believe that the promotion of the arts is a valuable endeavor that can improve the mental health of society, and therefore, it is important for governments to continue supporting artists.
One argument against providing financial support to artists is that the arts are not a lucrative industry and do not contribute significantly to the economy. This may be true in some cases, as the value of art is subjective and can vary widely depending on time, place, and audience. For example, in Vietnam, where there is relatively little interest in the arts, many artists struggle to make a living from their work and often need to take on other jobs to support themselves. However, it is important to note that the value of the arts is not solely financial. Art has the power to heal and inspire, and this benefit should not be overlooked.
In fact, supporting artists can have significant positive impacts on the mental health of society. The arts provide an outlet for creative expression, which can be therapeutic for individuals struggling with mental health issues. Additionally, exposure to art can promote a sense of connection and empathy among individuals, which can lead to greater social cohesion and a more vibrant community. For example, studies have shown that increased investment in arts programs in the United States has been correlated with improvements in public health and reduced rates of crime.
In conclusion, while it may be tempting to redirect funds away from the arts and towards more immediately pressing issues, it is important to recognize the value of the arts in improving the mental health and well-being of society. By supporting artists, governments can promote a more vibrant and connected community and create lasting benefits that extend beyond mere economic gains.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-16 | duonanh | 77 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | scorpiothienhat | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | scorpiothienhat | 78 | view |
| 2015-09-19 | Justin | 80 | view |
- Many students choose to study at colleges and universities that are far away from the places where they grew up Do the benefits of this outweigh the drawbacks 67
- More and more people in developing countries are purchasing cars for the first time What problems does this cause What do you think is a possible solution 73
- Governments give a lot of support to artists even though some people think it is a waste of money that could have been used elsewhere Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81341339383 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530864197531 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.429415483 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0957094017176 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415187316491 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468817974441 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678325705908 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389022190337 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.