The line graph below shows the householf recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015.
The graph provides information about the rates of household recycling in the UK, France and Germany over the period of 10 years from 2005 to 2015.
It can be seen that the figures for the UK and Germany experienced a steady increase over the period, finishing at the 1st and 2nd place overall. By contrast, that for Frace went down significantly until 2013 then finished at the 3rd place, despite recovering slightly two years later.
Looking at the graph for more detail, the household recycling rates in the UK, which started with 35% in 2005, rose minimally and flattened out 40% until 2009 before increasing sharply to a peak of just over 60% at the end of the period. Similarly, there was also a remarkable growth in the figure for Germany, from only around 20% at the beginning of the period to about 45% in 2011 then increased more slowly to finishing with over 55% in 2015.
By contrast, the rate of household recycling in France decline dramatically from a peak of 50% to only three fifth of that in 2013. Depite recovering to 40% at the end of the period, it finished at only 3rd place overall.
- The line graph below shows the production of paper and packaging wood pulp and sawn wood from 1980 to 2000 78
- The pie charts below compare water usage in San Diego California and the rest of the world 73
- The line graph shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 78
- The charts below show annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985 1995 and 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59595959596 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51324417558 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1174189058 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2857142857 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118038893518 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666659076358 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747755217006 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946896740119 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727795965986 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.