The assigned table contrasts the proportion of a series of travel transportation in Canada, Belgium, Germany, Netherlands. And the bar chart illustrates the five reasons for using cars in Canada supported by a survey.
From an overall perspective, people tend to consider cars as their first choice for travel among four countries, while people seem to prefer bicycles or on foot for travel in particular countries, and the remaining travel transportation sees a negligible percentage. We can also see that people have disproportionate causes for using cars in Canada.
According to the table chart, cars account for the majority proportion of journey transportation among four countries. To be precise, all are over 45 percent overall. Subsequently, public transport takes up 12 and 18 percent in Belgium and Germany respectively, which figures are similar when compared with the percentage of people on foot. In addition to that, people who choose bicycles or other modes of transportation are the minority. All are under three percent, except in the Netherlands, which is around 26 percent of the total prefer bicycles.
Looking at the car use bars chart, approximately 40 percent of people use cars because they do not have any alternative ways. After that, the needs for work make it the second largest category with a figure of 30 percent. Following that, the reason for convenience is a little bit less than the reason for commuting. Additionally, the reason for quicker takes up approximately 12 percent, while work nightshift constituted the lowest proportion, merely less than ten percent.
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics 73
- The charts below give information about world spending and population Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisonswhere relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- The table below gives information about the weekly consumption of ordinary milk and butter and high and low fat alternatives of milk and butter among different age groups in one European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the mai 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...g that, the reason for convenience is a little bit less than the reason for commuting. Add...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30980392157 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08532013048 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603921568627 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7803737008 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.153846154 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133534185204 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572233088098 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614186272703 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942699883998 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03638888862 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...g that, the reason for convenience is a little bit less than the reason for commuting. Add...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, while, in addition, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 255.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30980392157 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08532013048 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603921568627 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.7803737008 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.153846154 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133534185204 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572233088098 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614186272703 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942699883998 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03638888862 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.