The pie chart and the table indicate the employment distribution of nursing graduates in the UK in the year 2009.
Overall, it can be seen that the majority of nurses working in the health sector were mainly employed in hospitals. Notably, further study and other sectors attracted the lowest number of nursing graduates.
Looking at the chart for greater details, in 2009, about 84% of people finishing nursing courses worked in the health sector, compared to only 8% of those working and studying. The unemployed nurses after completing their course accounted for about 4%, while those studying further and other sectors accounted for half, only 2% each.
In terms of the health sector, the majority of nurses are employed in the hospital, making up about 73%, in comparison with 12.4% of those employed as midwives. There were 10.3% of nursing graduates working as community nurses, whereas those working as mental nurses occupied the lowest figure with only 0.4%. The percentage of people enrolled in parametric and other fields was about 1.3% and 2.7% respectively.
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that we do not need printed newspapers anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1724137931 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51282875721 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563218390805 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2916370318 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247143517552 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113463120971 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862038876359 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168916852076 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947156526807 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.